Legal Opinion
Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. Bohlssen
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 11, 1925No. 1183PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Quinn, J.
The following statement of the nature and result of the suit, which ap-pellees admit is correct, is taken from appellant’s brief:
“This is a suit arising under the Workmen’s Compensation, or Employer’s Liability Act of the state of Texas.
“The appellees here are the surviving wife and children of H. G. Bohlssen, who was accidentally killed on the 7th day of July, A. D. 1923, at the H. G. Bohlssen Manufacturing Company’s mill in Angelina county, Tex. The appellees filed claim with the Industrial Accident Board for compensation, which was contested by the appellant, Lumbermen’s Reciprocal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Millers' Mut. Casualty Co. v. HooverTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Cook v. Millers' Indemnity UnderwritersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Millers' Mut. Casualty Co. v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bell v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Harris v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940