Legal Opinion

Government of the Canal Zone v. Norma Clotilde Thrush G. (Garces) and Dorothy Gartlan

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1979No. 78-5767PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants are former employees of the Army and Air Force Exchange Service of the Canal Zone, convicted of conspiracy to defraud the Exchange, an agency of the United States Government, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 371. They now urge reversal of the convictions on the following grounds: (1) the trial court failed to instruct the jury that under C.Z. Code tit. 6, § 42(a) “[a] conviction can not be had on the testimony of an accomplice unless his testimony is corroborated by other evidence which in itself and without the aid of the testimony of the accomplice, tends to connect the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Noble C. BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. William Garner, Jr., Keith Jarrett, A/K/A Keith Brown, and Nathaniel RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Tillery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Roel Angel TrevinoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Willie Hardy KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Samuel B. Hewitt and Bobby Gene ChesserCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Government of the Canal Zone v. Obdulia Rosalia MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API