Legal Opinion

Foster v. Howeth

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided July 31, 2003No. 09-02-220-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DON BURGESS, Justice.

Appellant, Donald Foster, sued Appel-lee, Jerry Howeth, for malicious prosecution relating to an incident on May 19, 1999, in which Foster beat Howeth to the point of unconsciousness.

Foster was charged with robbery and the lesser included offense of assault. A jury convicted Foster of the lesser included offense of assault. Foster filed a lawsuit against Howeth for malicious prosecution. The trial court granted Appellee’s Motion for Summary Judgment and entered judgment in favor of Howeth against Foster. It is from this summary judgment that Foster appeals.

We begin…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Richey v. Brookshire Grocery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Michael Leblanc v. Detective C.D. Riley, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
  2. Michael Leblanc v. Detective C.D. Riley, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
  3. Michael Leblanc v. Detective C.D. Riley, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
  4. Ted Booher v. Zeig Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
  5. Ted Booher v. Zeig Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API