Legal Opinion

Richards Will

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1970No. Appeal, No. 21PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

This appeal raises the question of whether the hereinafter-quoted holographic writing is a will.

Maud T. Richards died on August 9, 1967. Two days later Miriam Becker, the decedent’s niece, petitioned the Register of Wills for letters of administration c.t.a. and offered for probate an undated document which purported to be decedent’s will. It was written on the back of an envelope, and read as follows:

*7“Will

Notify Miriam Becker to take care of me and my things for her use if I pass away Maud T. Richards”

This will,* which had been in the possession of Miriam…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kauffman WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Wenz's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Scott's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Crooks EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Johnson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of RitchieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Moore WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. In Re Estate of RitchieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. In re Estate of LaurinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. In re Estate of TylerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API