Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wood v. Woolfolk Properties, Inc.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 11, 1999No. Record 981197Published

1DissentJustice Compton

I agree that the trial court correctly granted the motion to strike the evidence regarding defendant Woolfolk Properties, Inc. I do not agree, however, that the trial court erred by allowing evidence regarding the absence of similar accidents at the curb area prior to plaintiff’s fall.

This case is controlled by Sykes v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 200 Va. 559, 564-65, 106 S.E.2d 746, 751 (1959). The majority’s argument attempting to distinguish Sykes from the present case is unpersuasive.

Sykes stands for the proposition that when a plaintiff presents evidence of a contemplated change by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sykes v. NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API