Legal Opinion

Yusem v. Butler

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 18, 1996No. 96-1801PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We reverse the trial court’s order which denied appellants’ motion to vacate the default entered against them.

Appellants’ attorney, Richard H. Perlman, abandoned his clients without notice and vacated his Florida office. Accordingly, service of an amended complaint by appellees upon Perlman at the lawyer’s vacated Florida office and at some California address could not be considered notice to his abandoned clients, whose failure to respond constituted excusable neglect.

There is no issue of appellants’ diligence in seeking to have the default vacated, appellees having stipulated to same.

GUNTHER…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cruz v. Caribbean Spring VillageDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Motors, Pumps & Accessories, Inc. v. Miami Medley Business & Industrial, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Joseph Ansaroff v. Maria Theresa LaurelesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API