Legal Opinion

State v. Rannels

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1993No. 26A91PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

Defendant was properly indicted for murder in the first degree, armed robbery, and conspiracy to commit armed robbery. The jury found defendant guilty as charged. His conviction of murder in the first degree was based upon theories of both felony murder and premeditation and deliberation. After the capital sentencing phase of the trial, because the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict as to punishment, the trial court, pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 15A-2000(b), sentenced defendant to life imprisonment. We find no error in defendant’s trial.

I

Evidence presented by the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. TrullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. Charles Phillips BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. McCullersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API