Legal Opinion

People v. Allen

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1916No. Crim. No. 515PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order denying a new trial. H. T. Dewhirst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Frank T. Bates, Walter J. Hartzell, Raymond E. Hodge, and Charles L. Allison, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This case is a companion to that of People v. Horgan, ante, p. 105, [162 Pac. 399], Crim No. 505, an opinion in which, affirming the judgment therein, was this day filed. The defendant here was jointly charged with Horgan and one Dan Boyd with robbing Jacob Widener. Upon trial he was convicted of assault with intent to rob one Jacob Widener. He appeals from the judgment and an order of court denying his motion for a new trial.

The facts as to the commission of the offense are identical with those presented in the Horgan case, and, as in that, the defendant here complains of a number of rulings…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. People v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. RichmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. People v. HorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. GaugerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. People v. GibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. BernalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. FossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. People v. BlueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API