Legal Opinion

Zeeman v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 16, 2001No. A01A0383PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Following a bench trial, Noah Zeeman was convicted of possessing cocaine in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

In reviewing the trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress, we construe the evidence “most favorably to uphold the findings and judgment of the trial court; the trial court’s findings on disputed facts and credibility are adopted unless they are clearly erroneous and will not be disturbed if there is any evidence to support…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bright v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Garmon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Hines v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Holt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. State v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Duckett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Minor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. State v. Greg WolfCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API