State ex rel. Schloss v. Stevens
Nevada Supreme Court
Original proceeding. Application by the State, on the relation of Rachel Schloss, for writ of prohibition against Theron Stevens. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Per curiam
This is an original proceeding in prohibition. The proceeding grows out of a state of facts, some of which are identical with those involved in the mandamus case against the same respondent (No. 1953; 34 Nev. 128.) The petitioner alleges that she made application for two certain lots to the respondent as trustee of the Goldfield townsite, which application was allowed, but that the amount assessed against said lots by the trustee was $17. Believing that said amount was largely illegal and excessive, and being so advised, she refused to pay *147such amount, and the deed remains undelivered. On the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Connecticut River Railroad v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Speed v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- State ex rel. Hahn v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- People ex rel. Jones v. ShermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mineral County v. STATE, DEPT. OF CONSERV.Nevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Johnson v. BettsArizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Gladys Baker Olsen Family Trust Ex Rel. Olsen v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Lewis v. SmartNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Mineral County v. STATE, DEPT. OF CONSERV.Nevada Supreme Court · 2001