Legal Opinion

People v. Townsend

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 2010No. B216325PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

Here we conclude possession of a “Molotov cocktail” is an offense involving an implied threat to use force or violence under the Mentally Disordered Offender (MDO) Act. (Pen. Code, § 2962.)

Rebio Townsend appeals a judgment committing him to the State Department of Mental Health for treatment as an MDO following his conviction of possession of destmctive devices, Molotov cocktails. (§ 12303.) We affirm.

FACTS

Townsend filed a petition for a hearing (§ 2966, subd. (b)) following a Board of Parole Hearings determination that he met the MDO criteria. He waived his right to a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. RemiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. United States v. Frank Ross, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. JenningsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  5. People v. DyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Gonzalez CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. People v. Petrovich CA5California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API