Legal Opinion

Dingman v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1992No. 20A03-9205-CR-145PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON PETITION TO ACCEPT INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Petitioner-appellant Brian D. Dingman requests acceptance of an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 4(B)(6).

In July 1991, Dingman was arrested after he was stopped at a roadblock. He was charged with being an habitual traffic offender when a computer check at the roadblock revealed his driving status. In August 1991, Dingman filed a motion to suppress evidence discovered as a result of the roadblock. Dingman's motion was denied in January 1992. In March 1992, Dingman filed a motion to reconsider. The court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Watson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Engle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. INB National Bank v. 1st Source BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Anderson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PetersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Wesley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. DeLong v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Concepcion v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Dingman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API