Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 28, 1986PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In a proceeding for leave to file a late notice of claim pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6), the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Orlando, J.), dated May 7, 1985, which granted the claimant’s motion for leave to file a late notice of claim against it.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The claimant applied for leave to file a late notice of claim three days after expiration of the 90-day period set forth in Court of Claims Act § 10 (2).

*249Since the State was directly involved in the investigation of the circumstances of the death of the claimant’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Santana v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Claims · 1977
  3. Prusack v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Crosland v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Eiseman v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tucholski v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Marcus v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Burke v. Incorporated Village of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Swart v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  5. Groell v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API