Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Burdell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1988No. CC 16-86-04163; CA A43052; SC S35565PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The issue in this case is whether ORS 86.770(3) entitles a commercial trust deed beneficiary to a deficiency judgment after a judicial foreclosure sale, even though the trust deed secured the unpaid balance of the purchase price of the real property. After defendants defaulted on a 1983 promissory note held by plaintiff, plaintiff brought this action seeking judgment on the note, judicial foreclosure of the commercial purchase money trust deed securing the note and a deficiency judgment. The trial court granted plaintiff s motion for summary judgment. Defendants appealed the trial court’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ladd & Tilton Bank v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. BurdellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Mt. Vernon National Bank v. MorseOregon Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sumner v. Enercon Development CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API