Legal Opinion

Voisen v. Kantor

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1970No. 8800PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKENNA, Justice.

From the record it appears that this action involves multiple claims within the scope of Rules 54(b) [§ 21-1-1(54) (b), N.M.S.A.1953]. In 1967, a judgment predicated upon findings and conclusions was granted to third-party plaintiff Robert Voisen, the appellee, against third-party defendant National Car Wash Systems, the appellant, who failed to appear at the time set for trial. Thereafter, in 1967, a Supplemental Order and Judgment was granted the appellee, reducing the judgment to $34,-750. Next, the appellant moved to vacate and set aside the judgment, which was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chronister Ex Rel. Chronister v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. MilesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ortega v. Transamerica InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Carpenter v. MerrettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Leal v. LealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Ortega v. Transamerica InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API