Legal Opinion
Mora v. McDonough
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 20, 2006No. 1D04-2137PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant, Julio Mora, appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his Petition for Writ of Mandamus, arguing in part that the trial court erred in dismissing his petition for lack of jurisdiction based on a misinterpretation of Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So.2d 361 (Fla.2003). Appellant also seeks review of the trial court’s order denying his motion for rehearing, arguing in part that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the motion after he filed a notice of appeal regarding the Order of Dismissal. Because we agree with appellant as to both points, we reverse the Order of Dismissal,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schmidt v. CrusoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Burgess v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Davidson v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Farr v. FarrDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
3Cited by2 opinions
- J.W. v. Agency for Health Care AdministrationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- US Bank National Association, Not in Its Individual Capacity but Solely as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT v. the Estate of Ismael Zayas, Alexander Zayas, Sr., Alexander Zayas, Jr., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ismael Zayas, Diana Zayas and Angelina RuggirelloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025