Legal Opinion

State v. Moose

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1978No. 7726SC958Published

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

Defendant contends in his first assignment of error that Archie L. Hargett was not competent to testify as to the contract of insurance between defendant and Northwestern Insurance Company. He argues that the only witnesses competent to testify as to the contractual relationship between defendant and Northwestern are Northwestern or its agent, Strickland Insurance Brokers. His rationale is that Mr. Hargett as broker of the policy had no authority to act as agent for Northwestern and thus, absent the intermediary agent Strickland, Mr. Hargett had no power to procure an insurance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. PoolosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. . LippardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Steele v. . CoxeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API