Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Regan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1956No. Case No. 90; Case No. 91; Case No. 92; Case No. 93PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, C. J.

The owner of a lien acquired on funds paid into the circuit court for Winnebago county under an order of that court insists that he is in the proper jurisdiction to establish and enforce his lien even if the debtor has become bankrupt. In support of his position he contends, and properly so, that a litigant who has begun his action in a court of competent jurisdiction is within his rights and does not have to yield his advantage. There is no dispute as to the facts involved in these appeals. They are set forth in the appellant’s brief and conceded by respondent to be “accurately stated” and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Bank of Commerce v. ElliottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Winner v. HoytWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Alexander v. WaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Woodman v. L. A. Olson Co. (In Re Woodman)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1981
  2. Giles v. Sun Bank, NADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. State of Wisconsin v. Bar Coat Blacktop, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1986
  4. Deardorff v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In Re Deardorff)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1996
  5. Sun Bank, NA v. Parkland DesignDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API