Groff v. City Saving Fund & Trust Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 38, Oct. T., 1908, by L. E. Ryder, from decree of C. P. Lancaster Co., Equity Docket, No. 4, p. 183, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report in case of Annie H. Groff v. City Saving Fund and Trust Company of Lancaster. Motion to quash appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
1. In view of the recent decision in Jones v. Lincoln Savings & Trust Co., 222 Pa. 325, it is needless to discuss the question of the jurisdiction of the court below, to appoint a receiver of the defendant corporation upon the bill filed by Annie H. Groff, even if the appellant be in position to raise the question.
2. The court below was right in its interpretation of our decree in Groff v. City Saving Fund & Trust Co., 32 Pa. Superior Ct. 416, quashing this appellant’s appeal from a former *568decree distributing another fund, and remitting the cause to the court below “to be further…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barlott v. ForneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Estate of FrazierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Keim's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
- Groff v. City Saving Fund & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
3Cited by6 opinions
- Henry's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Estate of Rachel C. Finley CoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Hanna EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Bobbitt's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Haller's CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.