Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Steenson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the District Court for Traill County, Charles A. Polloclc, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtWallin, J.

This action was brought to restrain the defendant, as county treasurer of Traill county, from seizing and selling in satisfaction of certain taxes alleged to be illegal in part, the goods and chattels of certain persons named in the complaint, Avhich persons it is alleged are seA^erally the owners of diArers shares of the capital stock of the plaintiff, and who collectively OAvn, as it is alleged, all of the plaintiff’s capital stock.

The taxes involved were assessed, equalized, and levied in the year 1895 by the taxing officials of the city of Hillsboro in Traill county, in which the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Board of Com'rs v. Searight Cattle Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1892
  3. O'Neal v. Virginia & Maryland Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
  4. Breeze v. HaleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  5. Adsit v. LiebIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. McBrideNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State ex rel. Farmers State Bank v. WallaceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API