Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Horowitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 15, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.
Claimant demands compensation for legal services rendered to The Bank of United States in connection with the adjustment of the judgment of Bank of United States v. Ansen, a five-year old judgment, wherein claimant alleges she was deprived of her fee by The Bank of United States.
The Superintendent of Banks took possession of The Bank of United States pursuant to section 57 of the Banking Law (as amd. by Laws of 1930, chaps. 664, 678)* on December 11, 1930.
Under the authority of section 72 of the Banking Law, the Superintendent specified May 5 to June 29, 1931, as the period for presenting…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Acken v. New York Title & Mortgage Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1934
- In re the State Bank of CanastotaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- In re Bank of Spencerport in LiquidationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Maleh v.Federal Deposit Ins.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979