Legal Opinion
Baha v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 21, 2020No. 14-494Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-494C (Filed: December 21, 2020) NOT FOR PUBLICATION ) MUHAMMAD TARIQ BAHA, ) ) Equal Access to Justice Act; 28 U.S.C. Plaintiff, ) § 2412(d); Substantially Justified v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES Now pending before the court in this breach of contract case is plaintiff Muhammad Tariq Baha’s motion for attorney’s fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Under EAJA, a prevailing party may be entitled to attorney’s fees and expenses where the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Stephen L. Helfer, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- James Doty and Susan Doty v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.