State ex rel. Wright v. Campbell
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRAHAN, Judge.
Relators Rod Wright and Unicom Group, Inc., seek a writ of prohibition to prevent Respondent from enforcing a subpoena duces tecum insofar as it would compel production of certain documents Relators claim were prepared for and are the property of an unrelated third party and are irrelevant to any issue in the underlying litigation. We order that our preliminary writ heretofore issued now be made permanent.
Relators are not a party to the suit which gave rise to the subpoena duces tecum. That lawsuit was instituted by Steak’n Shake, Inc. (“Plaintiff’) against the City of Richmond…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Anheuser v. NolanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Stecher v. DowdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- West County Care Center, Inc. v. Missouri Health Facilities Review CommitteeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- State ex rel. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- State ex rel. Referendum Committee Regarding Ordinance 4639 v. LaskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Transit Casualty Co. v. Transit Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- Transit Casualty Co. v. Transit Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2001