Bonner v. Woodall
Supreme Court of Georgia
Novation. Ordinance of 1865. Practice in the Supreme Court. Before Judge Hill. Twiggs Superior Court. April Term, 1873. When this case was called a motion was made to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that it had not been returned to the last July term of the court, as provided by agreement of counsel and order of court. The facts relied upon to sustain such motion were as follows: This case was tried at the April term, 1873, of Twiggs superior court.
Read the full summary
Novation. Ordinance of 1865. Practice in the Supreme Court. Before Judge Hill. Twiggs Superior Court. April Term, 1873. When this case was called a motion was made to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that it had not been returned to the last July term of the court, as provided by agreement of counsel and order of court. The facts relied upon to sustain such motion were as follows: This case was tried at the April term, 1873, of Twiggs superior court. On account of the sickness of W. K. De-Graffenreid, leading counsel for the plaintiff, an agreement of counsel was entered into and an…
1Opinion of the Court
Warner, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff brought his action against the defendants on a promissory note for the sum of $2,610 37, payable to the plaintiff, as guardian of Harry Horsy, dated 14th February, 1863, and due 1st day of January, 1864. On the trial of the case, the jury, under the charge of the court, found a verdict against Woodall for the sum of $560 00, with interest thereon, and the sum of. $146 65, with interest thereon, against Nelson, the security. The evidence in the record substantially discloses the following facts in relation to the consideration of the note sued on : That…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Partridge v. Williams' SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Foy-Adams Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- First National Bank of Commerce v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934