Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fleisher v. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 22, 1986No. 85-786Published

1DissentSchwartz, Chief Judge

The court’s conclusion that Dr. Fleisher’s contribution claim is barred because the Fund was not joined at an earlier stage of the litigation is directly contrary to section 768.31(4)(a),(c), Florida Statutes (1983),1 which unequivocally authorizes just the post-judgment action asserted below. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. v. Zack Co., 374 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Mount Sinai Hospital of Greater Miami, Inc. v. Mora, 342 So.2d 1063, 1065 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). The cases cited by the majority, e.g., New Hampshire Insurance Co. v. Petrik, 343 So.2d 48 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), hold only that a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taddiken v. FLORIDA PATIENT'S COMP. FUNDSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. PetrikDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Showell Industries, Inc. v. Holmes CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. MOUNT SINAI HOSP. OF GREATER MIAMI, INC. v. MoraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Wallace v. StrasselDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API