Legal Opinion
Diorio v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 28, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants City of New York and Doubleday Sports, Inc., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated March 4, 1992, as, granted the plaintiffs motion to renew their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them, vacated a decision of Justice Nahman dated November 11, 1991, granting that motion for summary judgment, and thereupon reinstated the plaintiffs cause of action against them, and the plaintiff separately…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Caffee v. ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Huttner v. McDaidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Pro Brokerage, Inc. v. Home InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Mackey v. MackeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cannistra v. GibbonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Robinson v. VianiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Nam Jin Chung v. M & S DeliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Hua Nan Commercial Bank, Ltd. v. AlbicoccoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Coregis Insurance v. MiceliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002