Legal Opinion

Haas v. Roe

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 16, 1998No. 96-05150PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, Raymond A Haas, challenges the final judgments entered in favor of appellees, Michael A Roe and Joseph T. Patsko. We agree that the trial court erred in entering final judgments in favor of Roe and Patsko and reverse and remand.

The appellant filed a complaint against his former law firm, Haas, Austin, Ley, Roe and Patsko, Inc. (HALRP), a Florida corporation, as well as his former law partners, Bruce Austin, Paul Ley, Michael Roe, and Joseph Patsko. The appellant sought declaratory and equitable relief and damages for breach of contract. Austin, Ley, Roe, Patsko, and HALRP flied…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edward L. Nezelek, Inc. v. Sunbeam Tel. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Gibbons v. BLAKE MEMORIAL HOSPITALDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Hawthorne v. WesleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API