Legal Opinion

Sunoco, Inc. (R & M) v. Toledo Edison Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 2011No. 2009-0880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) v. Toledo Edison Co., 129 Ohio St.3d 397,

2011-Ohio-2720.] SUNOCO, INC. (R&M), APPELLANT, v. TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) v. Toledo Edison Co., 129 Ohio St.3d 397,

2011-Ohio-2720.] Public utilities — Special contracts and reasonable arrangements in electric- service contracts — Most-favored-nation clauses — Commission misconstrued the language of the clause — Order reversed. (No. 2009-0880 — Submitted February 15, 2011 — Decided June 9, 2011.) APPEAL from the Public Utilities Commission, No. 07-1255-EL-CSS. __________________…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Aultman Hospital Ass'n v. Community Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Shifrin v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc. v. Franklin County Convention Facilities AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Letter of Notification Application of Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API