Suffolk Business Center, Inc. v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentKaye, J.
The Court is called upon to decide whether the repurchase provision in issue is a condition subsequent or a restrictive covenant, a determination that obviously has significant impact on plaintiff’s remedy.
If — as plaintiff grantor, Suffolk Business Center (SBC), argues — defendant violated a covenant or contract right, the *391remedy will be specific performance by reconveyance of property or the monetary equivalent. If, on the other hand, the provision is a condition subsequent, enforcement must take place through the procedural vehicle of RPAPL 1953. Under the statute, defendant’s interest…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Upington v. . CorriganNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Post v. . WeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Craig v. . WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Graves v. . DeterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Towle v. . RemsenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.