Boone v. State

APPELLANT’S motion for rehearing.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant contends in his motion for rehearing that we erred in holding that the cross-examination of his character witness, E. E. Lowe, did not transgress the rule announced by this court in Diggs v. State, 88 S. W. (2d) 103; Stephens v. State, 80 S. W. (2d) 980, and many other cases cited by him, discussing the rule. We have again read the record in the light of his motion for rehearing but remain of the opinion that the cross-examination of appellant’s character witnesses did not transgress the rule announced in the cases above…