Legal Opinion

In re Reilly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1996 and maintains an office in Latham, Albany County.

Having granted petitioner’s motion for an order declaring that no factual issues were raised by the petition and answer, and having heard respondent in mitigation, we now find respondent guilty of the professional misconduct charged and specified in Charges I, II and IV through VII of the petition.

Respondent mishandled funds in his attorney escrow account by making disbursements on behalf of certain clients in excess of corresponding deposits, thereby converting other clients’ funds in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API