In re Reilly
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1996 and maintains an office in Latham, Albany County.
Having granted petitioner’s motion for an order declaring that no factual issues were raised by the petition and answer, and having heard respondent in mitigation, we now find respondent guilty of the professional misconduct charged and specified in Charges I, II and IV through VII of the petition.
Respondent mishandled funds in his attorney escrow account by making disbursements on behalf of certain clients in excess of corresponding deposits, thereby converting other clients’ funds in…
2Cited by2 opinions
- In re ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004