Legal Opinion

State v. Barrett

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 24, 1989No. 21748-8-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtForrest, J.

Harland Barrett, a juvenile, pleaded guilty to the charge of taking a motor vehicle without permission in violation of RCW 9A.56.070. He appeals from the trial court's restitution order requiring him to pay $2,749. The sole issue for determination is whether there was a sufficient causal link between the crime committed by the appellant and the property damage to justify the restitution. We affirm.

RCW 9A.56.070(1), which prohibits taking a motor vehicle without permission, states:

[Ejvery person voluntarily riding in or upon said automobile or motor vehicle with knowledge of the fact that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. VinyardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  2. State v. StewardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  3. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. State v. HunotteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. State v. HiettWashington Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API