Legal Opinion
Robert Macioce, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Hisense USA Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 19, 2025No. 1:25-cv-01608Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ROBERT MACIOCE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 25 Civ. 1608 (PAE) Plaintiff, -v- OPINION & ORDER HISENSE USA CORPORATION, Defendant. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: This decision resolves a motion to compel arbitration in this putative class action. Plaintiff Robert Macioce brings claims against defendant Hisense USA Corporation (“Hisense”), alleging Hisense falsely represented to him and others that its TVs use certain display-enhancing technology. He brings claims of false and deceptive advertising,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.