Legal Opinion

Stegall v. Stegall (In Re Stegall)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided October 16, 1995No. 18-30668PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ARTHUR B. FEDERMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Plaintiff Cheri Huckstep, formerly Cheri Stegall, challenges the dischargeability of a debt assumed by her former husband, debt- or/defendant Kirk Stegall (“debtor”), as part of the property settlement in the parties’ dissolution proceeding. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) over which the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(b), 157(a), and 157(b)(1). For the reasons set forth below, I find that the debtor’s obligation to pay the assumed debt is dischargeable.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The facts in this case…

2Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Gibson (In Re Gibson)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Belcher v. Owens (In Re Owens)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1996
  3. Johnston v. Henson (In Re Henson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996
  4. Lee v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Schmitt v. Eubanks (In Re Schmitt)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API