Legal Opinion

Thiessen v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 2018No. 1080 C.D. 2017PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DAN PELLEGRINI, Senior Judge

Richard S. Thiessen (Claimant) petitions for review of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review’s (Board) decision affirming the Referee’s determination that Claimant is ineligible for unemployment compensation (UC) benefits under Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law) 1 because he voluntarily left his employment with J< & J Staffing Resources (Employer) without a necessitous and compelling reason. For the following reasons, we affirm.

I

In October 2015, Claimant began his employment with Employer, a temporary staffing agency. At the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wing v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Middletown Township v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Key v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Shrum v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Watkins v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. C. Quigley v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. E. Spivey v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. J.W. Cooke v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. K.T. Williams v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. P. McDaniels v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API