Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Woerpel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

This action was brought by appellant to recover premiums claimed to have been earned and due it under a policy of workmen’s compensation insurance issued by it to the respondents May 17, 1920. The question is whether the policy covered operations conducted by the respondents not specifically mentioned in the policy.

It appears that prior to the issuance of the policy respondents contemplated the erection of a garage at Dodgeville. They proposed to excavate the basement by day labor and to let contracts for the erection of the superstructure. This plan was carried out, but the contractors for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frint Motor Car Co. v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coal Operators Casualty Co. v. C. L. Smith & Son Coal Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  2. Sun Indemnity Co. v. LovellPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1938
  3. Coal Operators Cas. Co. v. CL Smith & Son Coal Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  4. Sun Indemnity Co. v. LovellConnecticut Superior Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API