Legal Opinion
Goulding v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 17, 1989No. 83 C 5692PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CONLON, District Judge.
After hearing the testimony of the witnesses, reviewing the exhibits offered by both parties, and considering the arguments of counsel, the court enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, in compliance with Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff Randall S. Goulding (“Goulding”) is a United States citizen. Stipulation ¶[ 42.
2. In 1971, Goulding graduated from the University of Illinois with a degree in accounting and finance. Id. at ¶ 1. He then joined the Chicago office…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Commissioner v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Federal Communications Commission v. American Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Randall S. Goulding and Michael M. UshijimaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Adler & Drobny, Ltd. And Sheldon Drobny v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- In re Refco Public Commodity Pool, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- Adler & Drobny, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992