Legal Opinion

Chertack v. Santangelo

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 1, 1972No. 55101, 55215 consPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dempsey

Following a jury trial a judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiffs, Melvin and Orabelle Chertack, awarding them $3,246.15 against John Santangelo for personal injuries and property damage resulting from an automobile accident. Garnishment proceedings were begun against the Home and Automobile Insurance Company, Santangelo’s insurer. Santangelo had not appeared at the trial and the company answered “no funds” to the garnishment summons and to interrogatories submitted to it. After an evidentiary hearing the court found in favor of the plaintiffs.

The insurance company urges reversal of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Becker v. BillingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Levinson v. Home Bank and Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Roon v. Van SchouwenIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Merriam v. McConnellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  5. Brooks v. GoinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Long v. Arthur Rubloff & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. Murphy v. UrsoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Mazzuca v. EatmonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Peterson v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Kress v. O'HaraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API