Haden v. Falls
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from a decree of tlie Circuit Court of Campbell county. Decree for the defendants. Complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
(after making the foregoing statement), delivered the opinion of the court.
In considering the case a serious question arises, not raised in the answers, nor discussed at the bar, and that is whether the coverture of Mrs. Falls does not stand in the way of any decree for the specific performance of the agreement against her husband.
The bill does not make the wife a party, but after alleging that her dower interest in the land is of little, if any, practical value, since there exist upon the land two deeds of trust, in which she united with her husband, securing sums aggregating more than the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Graybill v. BrughSupreme Court of Virginia · 1893
- Fortune v. . WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Cowan v. KaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Watts v. KinneySupreme Court of Virginia · 1831
3Cited by7 opinions
- Aetna Insurance v. AstonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Ford v. J. A. StreetSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Mooers v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
- Rosenow v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- God v. HurtSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.