Legal Opinion
Howard I.S. Ho v. Martin Marietta Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 20, 1988No. 87-3883PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY EDWIN SMITH, Circuit Judge:
This case regards the enforcement of a settlement of a federal cause of action brought in federal court. Plaintiff, Howard Ho, settled a job discrimination suit which he originally brought against defendant, Martin Marietta Corporation (“Marietta”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Five months after settling with Marietta, Ho filed a worker's compensation claim in Louisiana. Marietta moved for summary judgment in the court below to enforce the agreement and judgment that had settled Ho’s claims…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Cotton v. HintonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- PRIMUS AUTOMOTIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudolph A. BATARSE, Defendant, Jan C. Nielsen, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Michael K. Topalian, Roy Jacobs, Jr., Richard H. Manuel, and Bobby W. McDonald and Armando Lopez v. John N. Ehrman, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Darcy Foster v. Mydas Associates, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Coghlan v. StarkeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Alberti v. KlevenhagenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.