J. W. Starr & Sons Lumber Co. v. York
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
While counsel for the defendant insists upon our consideration of the general grounds, each and every argument is predicated upon the theory of agency or no agency. The evidence is amply sufficient to sustain the verdict.
We shall, therefore—following the argument and citations of authority of counsel for both the plaintiff and the defendant— proceed to secure a complete picture of the agency question here involved. It is sometimes difficult to evaluate evidence into our present concept of agency as reflected by legislation and adjudication so as to avoid abrogation or extension of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fielder v. DavisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Graham v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- McCoy v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Ellison v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- F. E. Fortenberry & Sons, Inc. v. MalmbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Royal Crown Bottling Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Sparks v. Buffalo Cab Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. TownsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. CumbieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.