Coker v. Pitts
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Probate Cóurt'of. Tallapoosa.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The present application, for the salé of? slaves for division, was made trader the act approved Peb- ■ ■ruary 5th, 1S56, which act was amendatory of the act approved February 15th, 1854, and of section 2677 of the Code. — See Pamphlet-Acts-of 1855-6, p. 20; Acts of-1853-4, p. 7. The petitioners in this case were not guardians of infants, or persons of wnsound ■mind ; but peti tioned in their own right,- they being adults.- The proof taken in the cause conclusively shows, that an. equitable “partition or division” of the slaves can not be made without a sale; but it is not shown, that it would…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Fennell v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1873
- Hasterlik v. HasterlikIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Cates v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895