Legal Opinion

Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation v. Holland & Hart

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 1992No. 91CA0244PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge SMITH.

In this legal malpractice action, defendants, Holland & Hart and Bruce Buell, appeal the final judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding plaintiffs, Buell Development Corporation, $3,364,011 in damages and $2,125,195 in pre-judgment interest. Plaintiffs cross-appeal the portion of the trial court’s judgment denying various costs. We reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial.

The judgment at issue here arose from defendants’ representation of plaintiffs in connection with the sale of stock in Kings County Development Corporation (KCDC), a California corporation, to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. v. DoughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Myers v. BeemColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Baker v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. Perry v. BrundageSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  5. Murray v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Stanfield v. NeubaumTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Mehaffy, Rider, Windholz & Wilson v. Central Bank Denver, N.A.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. Gibbons v. LudlowSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  4. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. v. BerenbaumColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Bear Creek Development Corp. v. Genesee FoundationColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API