State v. Nelson
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Armstrong, J.
— The primary issue in this case is whether RCW 9.94A.500(1) requires the trial court to order and consider a presentence investigation report (PSI) prior to sentencing a defendant found guilty of failure to register as a sex offender.1 The defendant, Dennis Wayne Nelson, also appeals his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender, arguing insufficient evidence. We hold that the plain language of RCW 9.94A.500(1)2 does not require the trial court to order a PSI because failure to register as a sex offender is not a “sexual offense.” We also hold that the evidence was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005