Legal Opinion

State v. Nelson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 22, 2005No. 31969-1-IIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Armstrong, J.

— The primary issue in this case is whether RCW 9.94A.500(1) requires the trial court to order and consider a presentence investigation report (PSI) prior to sentencing a defendant found guilty of failure to register as a sex offender.1 The defendant, Dennis Wayne Nelson, also appeals his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender, arguing insufficient evidence. We hold that the plain language of RCW 9.94A.500(1)2 does not require the trial court to order a PSI because failure to register as a sex offender is not a “sexual offense.” We also hold that the evidence was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API