Legal Opinion

Addendum to Opinion No. 65-85 (1985)

Missouri Attorney General Reports

Decided December 27, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Mr. Gale:

This addendum to the above-captioned opinion letter is in response to your question asking whether the provision of §252.240.2, RSMo Supp. 1984, providing for the commercial use of endangered plant species by regulation of the Missouri Conservation Commission of the State of Missouri, is void under 16 U.S.C. § 1535(f) and the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.

Section 252.240.2, RSMo Supp. 1984, provides in part:

2. The exportation, transportation, or sale of any endangered species of plant, or parts thereof, or the sale of or possession with intent to sell any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Man Hing Ivory and Imports, Inc., a California Corporation v. George Deukmejian, Governor of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. H.J. Justin & Sons, Inc., Dba Justin Boot Company, a Texas Corporation v. George Deukmejian, Governor of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. H. J. Justin & Sons, Inc. v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API