Legal Opinion

Bell Grocery Co. v. Booth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 20, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Richardson

Re-

versing.

At tile-May term, 1930, of the Harlan circuit court, a judgment on contested issues was entered, declaring the amount, '$1,043.15, with' interest, in favor of the Bell Grocery Company against the City Grocery Company, composed of Eosá Booth and S. B. Burkhart. An attachment which had been levied on certain property was sustained, and the right of the Bell Grocery Company to enforce a lien thereunder .to ^atisfy the $1,-043.15, and interest and cost of the action, was declared. A conveyance of a certain lot by Ross. .Booth to.. Nannie Booth was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. ViersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Brown v. VancleaveCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  3. Hall v. Smith-McKenney Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Parsons v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1885
  5. Siddall v. JansenIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Board of Dr'ge Com'rs of McLean Co. v. IgleheartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API