Legal Opinion

Ruggles Lightning Rod Co. v. Ayer

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 26, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

Suit is brought on a promissory note given in part payment, on June 17, 1928, of an account for merchandise sold and delivered in the course of transactions between the parties begun in March or April of the preceding year. Verdict for the plaintiff was directed by the court below and the matter comes to this court on exceptions; first, to the exclusion of testimony as to loss, claimed by way of sét-off, and, second, to the direction of verdict.

Pleading in set-off must be in the manner prescribed by statute, R. S., Chap. 87, Sec. 74, “in substance as certain asina declaration,” and, when…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Home Savings Bank v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Brighton Five Cents Savings Bank v. SawyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Inhabitants of Milo v. Milo Water Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API