De La Roche v. De La Roche

—-Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David Saxe, J.), entered September 14, 1994, denying appellants’ motion to quash certain subpoenas and for related relief, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

"In a matrimonial action, under equitable distribution and Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (4), broad financial disclosure is necessary and required”, and such discovery is not *209restricted to the parties but is obtainable from appropriate third parties (Gellman v Gellman, 160 AD2d 265, 267). Such discovery is permitted of an employer, even where there is no equity interest, especially where, as…