Legal Opinion

State v. Jacobs

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 30, 1991No. P114735; CA A65723PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. The issue is whether the trial court erred when it allowed an officer to testify about what defendant’s blood alcohol reading would have been, had he taken the breath test. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

After observing defendant travelling at approximately 55 miles per hour in a 25-mile-per-hour zone, Officer Lankins stopped defendant’s vehicle. As he approached defendant, Lankins detected a strong odor of alcohol and observed that defendant’s face was flushed. Defendant got out of his…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API