Legal Opinion
Saulnier v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 5, 1963No. Nos. 471-54 and 418-60PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge
In our previous opinion in this case (148 Ct. Cl. 507; 180 F. Supp. 412, cert. denied, 363 U.S. 829), we held plaintiff’s patent was valid and had been infringed by defendant. The case is now before us on the amount of the recovery.
It has been extremely difficult for the parties to ascertain the facts necessary to determine the amount to which plaintiff is entitled. Plaintiff made calls on the respective departments and they answered as best they could, but they were unable to supply us with the data necessary for an accurate determination. The Air Force stated that they could give the price…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Witold A. Badowski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Saulnier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pitcairn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Tektronix, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Bandag, Inc. v. Gerrard Tire Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Calhoun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- In re the Valuation Proceedings under Sections 303(c) & 306Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.